<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web site design, development, interactive marketing : WebSolvers Blog Orlando, FL &#187; search engine marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.websolvers.com/tag/search-engine-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.websolvers.com</link>
	<description>News and commentary regarding Web design, Web development, social media, and interactive marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:42:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google:  Getting to the Top</title>
		<link>http://blog.websolvers.com/google-getting-to-the-top/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.websolvers.com/google-getting-to-the-top/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mcerto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://209.208.39.47/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost every day I entertain the question of how one can snatch a number one listing on Google for a particular keyword or keyphrase.  As anyone who has worked with search engines know, this is not at all a simple answer.  There are too many variables to consider in terms of industry, stature [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost every day I entertain the question of how one can snatch a number one listing on <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> for a particular keyword or keyphrase.  As anyone who has worked with search engines know, this is not at all a simple answer.  There are too many variables to consider in terms of industry, stature in the marketplace, target market, and longevity.  My typical tact is to try not to give a definitive answer (because, often, one does not exist) but to help clients think about how Google functions and how it might work for them.  Similar to the &#8216;training versus educating&#8217; line of demarcation, the first step toward Google success is learning how to think about it.<br />
In my conversations with clients, I try and help them think through several concepts related to how Google functions with a Web site and how it assigns rankings.  Many of the mechanics of Google are trade secrets (<a href="http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1681544.htm">think the Coca-Cola recipe</a>) and unknown by anyone outside of a select few employees.  There are several widely accepted principles, though, that guide search engine marketers in how to cozy up to high Google rankings.<br />
For the sake of simplicity, let&#8217;s think of these accepted principles in <span style="text-decoration: underline;">two</span> categories:<br />
1.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>On-site factors</strong></span>:  Google takes a look at the content and structure of your Web site to determine how relevant it is to a particular keyword or keyphrase<br />
2.  <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Off-site factors</strong></span>:  Google looks at the greater Internet (factors external to your Web site) and how it relates to your site<br />
Once you understand this delineation, you&#8217;re on the way to understanding higher rankings.  Let&#8217;s take a look at some of the invididual principles within each of these categories.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>On-site factors</strong></span><br />
1. Google cares about your content, how original and genuine it is, how often it is updated, and how many times a particular keyword/keyphrase is used.<br />
2.  Google looks for specific, descriptive tags (called META tags and TITLE tags) and the keywords therein.<br />
3.  The presence of a site map (similar to an outline) within your Web site denotes structure, organization, and a specific hierarchy to Google.<br />
4.  Google evaluates your site to determine how structurally sound (i.e. strong coding) your site is as a measure of its relevance.<br />
5.  Google can&#8217;t often interpret images and FLASH content, so the site must contain a balance between readable text and graphics.<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Off-site factors</strong></span><br />
1.  Google counts the number of sites that link to yours.<br />
2.  Google determines how relevant/important those linking sites are; a link from a heavily-visited site is more valuable than a link from a site with little traffic.<br />
3.  Google looks to see how long your domain has been existence and in its database; as a rule of thumb, domains with longer lives are seen as more legitimate.<br />
4.  Google evaluates the text within incoming links as a way to characterize what words are associated with your site.<br />
5.  Google looks to other closely-related sites like a corporate blog or other affiliated site as a way to determine how relevant your site is.<br />
This list isn&#8217;t meant to represent a be-all / end-all.  Anyone who tells you that they have such a list is likely exaggerating (or violating a Google patent protection).  It hopefully is, though, a start toward helping you to strategically think about Google and how to find your way to the top!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.websolvers.com/google-getting-to-the-top/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Research &amp; Search Engine Marketing</title>
		<link>http://blog.websolvers.com/keyword-research-search-engine-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.websolvers.com/keyword-research-search-engine-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 14:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mcerto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://209.208.39.47/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of the marketers and business owners that I speak with are highly interested in being highly ranked in search engines&#8211;especially Google.  Many have gone to the trouble of performing some surface level research on the basics of search engine success:  things like meta tags, title tags, and incorporating keywords and phrases into [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the marketers and business owners that I speak with are highly interested in being highly ranked in search engines&#8211;especially Google.  Many have gone to the trouble of performing some surface level research on the basics of search engine success:  things like meta tags, title tags, and incorporating keywords and phrases into the site&#8217;s text.<br />
But one of the key issues that is surprising to people involves keyword selection.  I have found that those keywords and phrases that you assume will be successful are often not.  Using software tools, we often explore the real data reflecting the words/phrases that searchers are using and how often they are being used.<br />
I&#8217;m usually surprised when I look at the search volume of various terms (which I assume to be popular) in contrast to those phrases which are similar in nature.  For example, I once saw that &#8216;personal injury law&#8217; didn&#8217;t have close to the level of search volume as &#8216;auto accident attorney.&#8217;  Humans search differently than that of the marketer&#8217;s perception.  Keyword research is essential to search engine success.<br />
Brian Clark has a <a href="http://www.copyblogger.com/the-5-essential-elements-of-search-engine-keyword-research/">great piece on his blog</a> describing the art of keyword research and why it is important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.websolvers.com/keyword-research-search-engine-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
